Active Learning Center #7
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 5 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 5 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 114
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Jul 10, 20251 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/10/2025, Subject to Change…Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 7/10/2025, subject to change pending programmatic review. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search.
Dec 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Complaint #94463 Investigation Conducted on 12/17/2024, Subject…Complaint
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Complaint #94463 investigation conducted on 12/17/2024, subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer spoke with the Complainant on 12/17/2024. A full inspection was not conducted. The following room ratios were observed: Infants: 1:4 One's: 2:13 Twos': 1:7 Three's/Four's: 1:13 Four staff members were interviewed during this investigation. 1 staff file was reviewed during the investigation. 1 of 1 Fin
Jul 16, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/16/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 7/16/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 3 of 3 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. Compliance Officer: Archana Navin
Mar 18, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 3/18/2024, Subject To…Complaint
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the complaint investigation conducted on 3/18/2024, subject to change pending programmatic review. A complete inspection was not conducted. Compliance Officer: Stacy Marchelli The ratios observed were: Infants 1:4 1's 2:16 2's 1:8 Preschool 2:13 5's School-age 1:20 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: The Compliance Officer emailed the complainant for complaint 81248 on 3/12/24. No
Aug 22, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Investigation Was to Conduct Complaint #62170 Investigation on August 22, 2023Complaint
The purpose of the investigation was to conduct complaint #62170 investigation on August 22, 2023. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The ratios observed were: Infants: 1:5 1-year-old children: 1:6 2-year-old children: : 2:9 3-year-old children: 2:20 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. Upon completion of complaint investigation #62170, it was determined from observation and interview that the allegations were unsubstantiated. There were
Jul 27, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on July 27, 2023, and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on July 27, 2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Stacy Marchelli Compliance Officer #2: Monika Jones A full inspection was conducted at this time. 3 of the 3 fingerprint clearance cards were verified through the DPS website during the inspection. Please complete the plan of corrections on the licensing portal within 10 days of receiving this Sta