Allen's Preschool
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.Not Available
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.Not Available
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), Hazardous Materials Handling (2), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). Of 5 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Feb 17, 20263 Findings1 Critical2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-13(9)(b) by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals Accessible To…R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(9)(b) by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the kitchen, there were chemical cleaners in an unlocked cabinet. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on January 9, 2025.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-11(9)(b) by Not Maintaining Security and Supervision of ChildrenR381-100-11(9)(a)-(f)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-11(9)(b) by not maintaining security and supervision of children. At the facility, there was a child who was not signed in. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 14, 2023.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by Having Choking Hazards Accessible to Children Younger…R381-100-13(4)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In Area 1 and Area 2, there were choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on March 6, 2
Jan 9, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Children Younger Than Two Years Old Are Cared…R381-100-10(3)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that children younger than two years old are cared for in an area that is physically separated from older children when there are more than 8 children. At the facility, there were 3 children under the age of two in a group of 14 child
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Having Documentation on Site of CPR and First Aid…R381-100-7(21)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having documentation on site of CPR and First Aid certification for a caregiver who was at the facility. At the facility, there were no caregivers that had CPR and First Aid certification documentation during the time of inspection. This was a