Amanda Flores
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
3 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 14 Findings
Most recent: Nov 24, 2025⤓ Download Inspection History Report (PDF)
14 Important
Across 3 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (5), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), and Building & Premises Safety (2). None of the 14 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Nov 24, 20259 Findings9 Important
- Licensing Specialist Was Not Able to Observe the Registration Displayed Conspicuously.13A.15.02.01D
- LS Was Not Able to Observe a Written Agreement in the Children's File13A.15.03.03A
- LS Was Not Able to Observe a Sub Log13A.15.03.03C
- LS Was Not Able to Observe a Fire Drill Log.13A.15.03.03F
- Licensing Specialist Observed Emergency Forms That Were Not Updated with a Date.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- LS Observed Children Files That Were Missing the Appropriate Lead Screening.13A.15.03.04C
- LS Observed a Socket That Was Not Capped or Plugged.13A.15.05.04B(1)
- Provider Is Reminded to Wait Until an Approval Email or Letter Is Sent Before Allowing a Substitute to Be Alone.13A.15.06.03B(1)
- LS Observed Cleaning Product in the Restroom That Was in Each of the Children in Care.13A.15.10.02
Dec 10, 20242 Findings2 Important
- Licensing Specialist Observed Emergency Forms That Were Not Updated Annually.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- Licensing Specialist Observed an Electrical Socket That Was Not Plugged, or Capped.13A.15.05.04B(1)
Dec 8, 20233 Findings3 Important
- Licensing Specialist Observed Three Child's Emergency Forms That Were Missing Information, and Annual Updates.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- Licensing Specialist Observed 3 Emergency Forms That Were Not Updated, and Missing Annual Update.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- Licensing Specialist Was Not Able to Observe 1% or Nonfat Milk Furnished by the Provider13A.15.12.01D