Skip to main content
Childery

Amauri Montessori School, Llc

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. Nov 21, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/21/25 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 11/21/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. 3 of 3 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days The following item is due within 10 days of receiving this document: A copy of the current liability insurance

  2. May 28, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-year Inspection Conducted on 5/28/2025, Subject to Change…Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-year inspection conducted on 5/28/2025, subject to change pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. 3 of 3 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search.

  3. Dec 3, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 12/3/24 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 12/3/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin 2 of 2 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days

  4. Jun 20, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection (Midyear Inspection) Conducted On…Midyear

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection (Midyear Inspection) conducted on 6/20/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The provider will email the Emergency Disaster Contact form. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspe

  5. Feb 2, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00068244 Investigation and an Initial Monitoring Inspection On…Complaint Initial Monitoring

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct Complaint #00068244 investigation and an Initial Monitoring inspection on 2/2/24. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer #1: Jennifer Forschino Health Care Compliance Manager: Andrea Rach Ratios observed were: 1:1 There were 2 staff members interviewed during this investigation. There was 1 staff file reviewed during this investigation. Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it was determined fr

  6. Dec 5, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on 12/5/23, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial inspection conducted on 12/5/23, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Jennifer Forschino Compliance Officer #2: Patti Longman Compliance Officer Supervisor: Andrea Rach A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via