Skip to main content
Childery

Amore Preschool

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
87
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Jun 11, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 6/11/2025 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 6/11/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the notice of inspection rights was given to the Provider. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Empower Self-Evaluation invitation link and the Emergency Disaster Contact Form were sent to the provider. The DES Group Size requ

  2. Jul 18, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection on 07/12/2024 Was to Conduct Complaint #00086712 InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection on 07/12/2024 was to conduct Complaint #00086712 Investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:11 and 2:13 Playground: 1-5-year-old children: 1:12 There were 4 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 2 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Compliance Officer #1 contacted the complainant via telephone. Documentation observed were attendance records and Emergency, Inform

  3. Jun 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • Amended Statment of Deficiencies on 7.11.24 The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance…Compliance (Annual)

      Amended Statment of Deficiencies on 7.11.24 The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 6/17/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation invitation link was sent to the provider. The DES Grou

  4. Apr 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection on 04/17/2024 Was to Conduct Complaint #00078724 and Compliant #00078818 InvestigationsComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection on 04/17/2024 was to conduct Complaint #00078724 and Compliant #00078818 Investigations. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 3:6 1-5-year-old children: 2:19 There were 4 staff interviewed during this investigation. There was 1 staff file reviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Founder The Compliance Officer #1 contacted the complainant via email on 04/16/2024. Documentation observed w

  5. Oct 10, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed During the Modification Inspection on 10/10/2023Modification

      There were no deficiencies observed during the Modification Inspection on 10/10/2023. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Infant Room #5 is not approved for occupancy at this time. Please email photos of the nine cribs, plexiglass installation and reattached baseboard near the diaper changing station. Compliance Officer is Heather Bauer.

  6. Jun 20, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 6/20/2023 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 6/20/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Group Size requirements were observed to be comp

  7. Jun 15, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint #00060080 InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Complaint #00060080 Investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:10 1-2-year-old children: 2:13 2-4-year-old children: 2:13 3-5-year-old children: 1:13 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 6 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Facility Director, Designated Person (owner), The Compliance Officer #1 contacted the c