Austin, Cynthia
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.Not Available
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.Not Available
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (4) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). Of 5 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Mar 4, 20251 Finding1 Critical
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-8(3)(c) by Not Ensuring That a New Background Check Form And…R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c)
The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-8(3)(c) by not ensuring that a new background check form and fingerprints are submitted for a covered individual that has turned 18 years old. At the time of inspection, one household member has not had their fingerprints scanned. This was a repeat rul
Jul 23, 20244 Findings4 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Items with Sharp Points Accessible to ChildrenR430-90-13(3)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having items with sharp points accessible to children. In the outdoor play area, there were thistle weeds throughout the lawn and rose branches with thorns accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Choking Hazards Accessible to Children Younger Than Three…R430-90-13(4)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In the kitchen, there were small plastic pieces accessible in a drawer and in the outdoor play area, there was a marker lid on the ground. This was a repeat rule noncompli
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Strangulation Hazards on or Within the Use Zone of Any…R430-90-19(13)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, each of the handgrips on the rock climbing wall were loose.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Having a 3 Foot Use Zone or Cushioning Around the Stationary…R430-90-19(3)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having a 3 foot use zone or cushioning around the stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, there were tree branches and rose branches within the use zone of the play set. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.