Skip to main content
Childery

Beth El Center For Early Childhood Education

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
102
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

5 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 5 Findings
5 Important

Across 5 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4) and Medication Administration (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.

See All 5 Inspection Visits
  1. Feb 24, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Inspection Conducted on 02.24.26, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the annual inspection conducted on 02.24.26, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Bill of Rights to the facility director at the time of the inspection. Four fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were verified as valid through the DPS website. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of rece

  2. Jan 13, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed During the Modification Inspection Conducted on 01.13.26, and Are Subject To…Modification

      The following deficiencies were observed during the Modification inspection conducted on 01.13.26, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. The following was discussed, but not limited to: *Ensure freezer temperature is maintained below zero. *Ensure class schedule is posted. *Ensure the person administering medications is documented in writing.

  3. Nov 20, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation #00150660 on 11.19.25Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Complaint investigation #00150660 on 11.19.25. A full inspection was not conducted. The following deficiencies were observed and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Business Bill of Rights to the Facility Director at the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of this

  4. Mar 6, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 3/6/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 3/6/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search.

  5. Mar 13, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 3/3/24, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 3/3/24, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Jennifer Forschino A full inspection was conducted at this time. 6 of 6 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. T