Skip to main content
Childery

Booker T Washington Child Development Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Preschool
Licensed capacity
50
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. Mar 9, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Compliance Inspection Conducted on 3/9/26Modification

      No deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification Compliance Inspection conducted on 3/9/26. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discusse

  2. Nov 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/17/25 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/17/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Emp

  3. Aug 25, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/25/25 And…Modification

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification Compliance Inspection conducted on 8/25/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance card for 1 staff member was verified to be valid thr

  4. Jul 21, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/21/25Modification

      No deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification Compliance Inspection conducted on 7/21/25. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. Room 5 and Room 7 were approved for use. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: Modification application process.

  5. Nov 20, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/20/24Compliance (Annual)

      No deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/20/24. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.

  6. Nov 28, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/28/2023, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/28/2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.