Skip to main content
Childery

Bright Ideas Childcare & Learning Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
113
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

5 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 5 Findings
5 Important

Across 5 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.

See All 5 Inspection Visits
  1. Dec 29, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00151305 Investigation on 12/29/2025Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00151305 investigation on 12/29/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:2 1-yr-old Children: 1:3 2-yr-old Children: 1:5 3-School-Age Children: 2:14 There were 4 staff members interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Director Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it was determined from observation and interview that 1:1 allegation lacked sufficient ev

  2. Nov 24, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00151305 Investigation on 11/24/2025Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00151305 investigation on 11/24/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:3 1-year-old Children: 1:6 2-year-old Children: 1:7 3-year-old Children: 1:11 There were 3 staff members interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Owner Documentation observed was: photographs, email Upon completion of the complaint investigation #00151305, it was determined from obs

  3. Apr 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint # 00124808 Investigation and Conduct an Annual Compliance…Complaint Compliance (Annual)

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint # 00124808 investigation and conduct an Annual Compliance inspection on 4/9/2025. The following deficiencies were observed and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed at the time of the inspection. The Notice of Inspection Rights were provided to the Licensee at the time of the Inspection. Ra

  4. Sep 4, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint # 00089255 Investigation on 09/04/2024Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint # 00089255 investigation on 09/04/2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer #1: Monika Jones Compliance Officer #2: Fred Geyser Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1-year-old children: 2:8 2-year-old children: 2:11 3-year-old children: 2:18 There were 5 staff members interviewed during this investigation. There were 5 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Owner, D

  5. Apr 19, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 04/19/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 04/19/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of 5 s