Skip to main content
Childery

Busy Bees Palm Valley Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
242
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

9 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 9 Findings
9 Important

Across 9 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6) and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (3). None of the 9 findings were critical.

See All 9 Inspection Visits
  1. Jan 30, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 01.30.26 for Case…Complaint

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Complaint investigation conducted on 01.30.26 for case #00156526. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infant: 3:9 Toddler 1: 2:8 Toddler 2: 2:11 Toddler 3: 1:8 Toddler 4: 1:6 Toddler 5: 2:6 Preschool 1: 2:11 Preschool 2: 2:10 Preschool 3: 1:9 Pre-K 1: 1:13 Others interviewed: -The Complainant -Director -Three staff members The following was discussed, but not limited to: *Ens

  2. Nov 7, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 11.07.25 for Case #00149970Complaint

      There were no deficiencies found at the time of the complaint investigation conducted on 11.07.25 for case #00149970. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The following was discussed, but is not limited to: *Ensure children are supervised at all times during nap time. Ratios observed were: Infant 1: 2:10 Infant 2: 1:5 Tod. 1 (One's): 1:5 Tod. 2 (One's): 2:11 Tod. 3 (Ones'-Two's): 2:11 Tod. 4 (Two's): 1:7 Tod. 5 (Two's): 1:7 Preschool 1 (Two's-Three's): 2:10 Presc

  3. Sep 10, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Inspection Conducted on 09.10.25, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the annual inspection conducted on 09.10.25, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Bill of Rights to the facility director at the time of the inspection. A link to the Empower Self-Evaluation was sent to the facility director. The Emergency Disaster Plan update form was completed at the time of the inspection. Six finger

  4. Aug 27, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of Complaint #AZ00036914 Investigation Conducted on 8/27/25 and Is…Complaint

      The following deficiency was observed at the time of Complaint #AZ00036914 investigation conducted on 8/27/25 and is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 8/27/25. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 2:10 Infants: 2:10 Ones: 1:6 Ones: 2:12 Twos:2:16 Twos: 2:8 Twos/Threes: 2:16 Threes: 1:

  5. Jun 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of This Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00131580 Investigation Conducted on 6/04/2025Complaint

      The purpose of this inspection was to conduct Complaint #00131580 investigation conducted on 6/04/2025. A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infant: 2:9 1/2-Year-Old Children: 2:8 1/2-Year-Old Children: 1:7 2-Year-Old Children: 1:8 2-Year-Old Children: 1:7 2-Year-Old Children: 1:4 3-Year-Old Children: 1:8 4-Year-Old Children: 1:10 4/5-Year-Old Children: 1:13 School-Age Children: 1:5 Three staff members were inte

  6. Apr 16, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00127077 Investigation Conducted on 4/16/25 and Are…Complaint

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00127077 investigation conducted on 4/16/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 4/16/25. An e-mail message was sent to the Complainant on 4/16/25. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 2:10 Infants: 2:9 Ones: 1:6

  7. Jan 28, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #96348 Investigation on 01/28/2025Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #96348 investigation on 01/28/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer #1: Monika Jones Compliance Officer #2: Stephanie Jake Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:5 Infants: 1:6 1-year-old Children: 1:6 1-year-old Children: 1:6 2-year-old Children: 1:8 2-year-old Children: 1:9 3-year-old Children: 1:11 3-year-old Children: 1:11 3-year-old Children: 1:12 There were 4 staff members interviewed

  8. Dec 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 12/6/2024 And…Initial Monitoring

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection conducted on 12/6/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the following: 1) Modification request to add the facility van onto the current license. Compliance Officer is AuReyon Thompson

  9. Sep 12, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on 09/12/2024, and Are Subject…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Inspection conducted on 09/12/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. *Please submit pictures or documentation of all the corrections to complete the Initial paperwork. *Monitor the maintenance of the wooden structures in the Toddler outdoor activity area. The Emergency Disaster