Caliday Before and After Care of Hampton
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 60
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (2), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Jul 15, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Program Did Not Have Written Information About He Child's Individual Needs Even Though the Parent Stated That The…13A.16.08.01C
The program did not have written information about he child's individual needs even though the parent stated that the child had an IEP. The child no longer attends the program.
Jun 6, 20255 Findings5 Important
- Program Does Not Have a Current Fire Inspection13A.16.02.03C(4)
- There 2 Children Who Needs the Physician Information Listed on the Emergency Card13A.16.03.04C
There 2 children who needs the physician information listed on the emergency card, 1 child need emergency contact numbers and two children need authorized pick up people identified on the emergency card.
- There Is One Staff Member Who Is Missing Orientation to COMAR13A.16.03.05C
- There Is One Staff Member Who Does Not Have Orientation to COMAR13A.16.06.02
- The Emergency Disaster Plan Needs to Be Updated Annually13A.16.10.01A(3)(d)
Apr 22, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Are 7 Children Who Need Their Physician Contact Number Listed on Their Emergency Form13A.16.03.04C
There are 7 children who need their physician contact number listed on their emergency form, 1 child that needs an authorized pick up person designated on their emergency card, and one child that needs the phone number of their emergency contact person listed. There are 4 children who need their eme