Skip to main content
Childery

Casita Daycare & Preschool

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
262
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

5 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 5 Findings
5 Important

Across 5 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5). None of the 5 findings were critical.

See All 5 Inspection Visits
  1. Sep 3, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on September 3, 2025, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on September 3, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. There were two personnel files reviewed. Both of the fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Complete and submit a Plan of Corrections via the online portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies.

  2. May 12, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00130156 and #00130311 on May 12, 2025Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00130156 and #00130311 on May 12, 2025. Note: A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were in compliance at time of inspection. There were seven staff members interviewed during this investigation. There were four children interviewed during this investigation. There were three staff files reviewed during this investigation. There were two children’s files reviewed during this i

  3. Sep 4, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00089416 on September 04, 2024Complaint Compliance (Annual)

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00089416 on September 04, 2024. A compliance inspection was also conducted at this time. Two personnel files were reviewed. Both of the fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Ratios observed were: in compliance at time of inspection. There were four staff members interviewed during this investigation. There was one child’s file r

  4. Jun 19, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00085404 on June 19, 2024Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00085404 on June 19, 2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: in compliance at time of investigation. There were six staff members interviewed during this investigation. The complainant was contacted via phone and email on 2 occasions with no response. Documentation observed was: class rosters, attendance forms. Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it wa

  5. Sep 12, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on September 12, 2023, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on September 12, 2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer 1: Laurie McKenna Compliance Officer 2: Amanda Valenzuela A full inspection was conducted at this time. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Written Documentation of Corrections was not accepted at the time