Casita De Lety / Casitadelety Llc
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 5 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 5 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Group Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
May 6, 20261 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on May 6Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies found at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on May 6, 2026, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. There were three personnel files reviewed. All three of the fingerprint clearance card were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided to the facility at the time of inspection. BCCL staff emailed the Empower Self-Evaluation Assessment link to the
Feb 19, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00159441 on February 19, 2026Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00159441 on February 19, 2026. Note: A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: five children present with the Provider. There were two staff members interviewed during this investigation. Documentation observed: text messages There were four fingerprint clearance cards verified through the DPS website as valid at the time of the inspection. Upon completion of the comp
Nov 5, 20251 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Mid-year Inspection Conducted on November 05Midyear
There were no deficiencies found at the time of the mid-year inspection conducted on November 05, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Note: A full inspection was not conducted. There were three fingerprint clearance cards verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.
May 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on May 9, 2025, and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on May 9, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Complete and submit the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. Items discussed, but not limited to: * Menu - in English and list specific fla
Jul 15, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on July 15, 2024, and Are…Initial Monitoring
There were no deficiencies found at the time of the initial monitoring inspection conducted on July 15, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Note: a full inspection was not conducted. Items discussed, but not limited to: * New DCS procedure Four of four fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Gas inspection: 01/11/2024 Insurance: expires 04/11/2025 Compliance Officer: Christine Fior
May 15, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on May 15Compliance (Initial)
There were no deficiencies found at the time of the initial inspection conducted on May 15, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. There were four personnel files reviewed. All four of the fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. License effective 05/16/24 Liability Insurance: expires 01/31/25 Gas Inspection: 01/11/24 Compliance Officer 1: Christine Fiore Compliance Officer 2: Ryan Mapes