CCACC Academy
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 2 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 2 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 171
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (5), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (4), and First Aid & Pediatric CPR (1). Of 11 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Jul 25, 20238 Findings1 Critical7 Important
- Specialist Observed an Epi Pen Needed for a Child in Care Not in the Original Container but Rather in a Ziploc Bag13A.16.11.04A(3)
Specialist observed an Epi Pen needed for a child in care not in the original container but rather in a Ziploc bag. Facility is asked to obtain the original container and submit a letter of corrections upon completion.
- Specialists Observed More Than Seven Children's Emergency Forms Missing Either the Person Authorized to Pick the Child…13A.16.03.04C
Specialists observed more than seven children's emergency forms missing either the person authorized to pick the child up, at least one emergency contact, the child's physician or source of health care, the parents signature and date, or the back or second page of the form. Facility is asked to revi
- Specialists Observed Three Children's Files Out of the Files Reviewed Missing the First Part of the Health Inventory13A.16.03.04D(1-2)
Specialists observed three children's files out of the files reviewed missing the first part of the health inventory. Facility is asked to review all children's files for completion and submit a letter of corrections upon completion.
- Specialists Observed Two Children's File Out of the Files Reviewed Missing the Second Part of the Health Inventory13A.16.03.04D(3)
Specialists observed two children's file out of the files reviewed missing the second part of the health inventory. Facility is asked to review all children's files for completion and submit a letter of corrections upon completion.
- Specialists Did Not Observe Proof of a Lead Blood Test or a Doctors Not Stating It Is Not Needed for Five Children Out…13A.16.03.04E
Specialists did not observe proof of a lead blood test or a doctors not stating it is not needed for five children out of the files reviewed. Facility is asked to review all children's files for completion and submit a letter of corrections upon completion.
- Specialists Did Not Observed Proof of Immunizations or a Religious Objection for Five Children Out of the Files Reviewed13A.16.03.04G
Specialists did not observed proof of immunizations or a religious objection for five children out of the files reviewed. Facility is asked to review all children's files for completion and submit a letter of corrections upon completion.
- Specialist Were Not Able to Review Proof of Ten Aides Having Completed the Aide Orientation at the Time of The…13A.16.06.12C
Specialist were not able to review proof of ten aides having completed the aide orientation at the time of the inspection. Facility is reminded that all aides must complete the aide orientation within six months of hire.
- Specialists Did Not Observe Paper Towels13A.16.10.02E
Specialists did not observe paper towels, liquid fragrance-free soap, thermometer, or disposable wash clothes being maintained in the first aid kit. Facility obtained all of the missing items outside of the soap at the time of the inspection.
Jun 13, 20233 Findings3 Important
- Specialists Were Informed at the Time of the Inspection That Four Staff Members Began Working at the Facility as Early…13A.16.03.06A(1)
Specialists were informed at the time of the inspection that four staff members began working at the facility as early as February 2023. Facility must submit the original, notarized Release of Information to add these staff members.
- Licensing Specialist Did Not Observe Medical Evaluation Conducted by a Practicing Physician for 3 Staff Member.13A.16.06.04A(1)
- Specialists Were Not Able to Review Proof of Continued for the Directors at the Time of the Inspection13A.16.06.05C(1)
Specialists were not able to review proof of continued for the directors at the time of the inspection. Facility is asked to have the training completed and submit photographic evidence upon completion.