Skip to main content
Childery

Children's Place Learning Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
75
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Sep 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/17/2025Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the Compliance Inspection conducted on 9/17/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. 4 of 4 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The fol

  2. Sep 30, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/30/2024, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 9/30/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Chloe-James Rossi Compliance Officer #2: Fred Geyser The Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The following was discussed but is not limited to: *Ensure the evacuation plan is posted near a designated exit of each room. There were 4 staff files reviewed. 4 of the 4 fingerprint clea

  3. Jul 18, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 7/18/2024 and Are…Monitoring

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Monitoring Inspection conducted on 7/18/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Due to Enforcement, the Licensee will be notified when the Written Documentation of Corrections is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal. 3 of 3 Fingerprint Clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The following was discussed and not limite

  4. Feb 27, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation 78642 on 2.27.2024Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Complaint investigation 78642 on 2.27.2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A Plan of Corrections is not being accepted at this time. Ratios observed were as follows: 1's 1:4 2's 1:7 3's & up 1:9 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 3 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: The complainant. Upon completion of Complaint investigation 78642 it was

  5. Feb 9, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint Investigations 67895 & 68678 and a Monitoring Inspection On…Complaint Monitoring

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct Complaint investigations 67895 & 68678 and a Monitoring inspection on 2.9.2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A Plan of Corrections is not being accepted at this time. Ratios observed were as follows: 1's and up 1:7 3's room 0:1 There were 5 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 6 staff files reviewed during this investigation. There were 2 children interviewed during this investigation. O

  6. Dec 1, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the 2 Month Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 12/1/2023 And…Initial Monitoring

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the 2 month Monitoring Inspection conducted on 12/1/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A follow-up inspection will be conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 5 of 5 Fingerprint Clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The following was discussed

  7. Sep 25, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on 9/25/2023 and Are Subject…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Inspection conducted on 9/25/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days. Please include pictures of the corrected deficiencies. 6 of 6 Fingerprint Clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The following items were discussed: 1. Staff attendance records 2. Monthly fire drills 3. Notification of pesticides