Skip to main content
Childery

Congregation Anshei Israel Esther B Feldman Preschool/Kindergarten

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
99
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

4 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 4 Findings
4 Important

Across 4 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4). None of the 4 findings were critical.

See All 4 Inspection Visits
  1. Aug 6, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on August 6Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies found at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on August 6, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. There were two personnel files reviewed. Both of the fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Items discussed, but not limited to: * New DCS website process

  2. Aug 7, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on August 7, 2024, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on August 7, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. There were two personnel files reviewed. Both of the fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Complete and submit a Plan of Corrections via the online portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. Fire Inspection: (annual) expires 07/17/

  3. Aug 8, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on August 8, 2023, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on August 8, 2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer 1: Laurie McKenna A full inspection was conducted at this time. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Written Documentation of Corrections was not accepted at the time of the inspection. Please complete and retu

  4. Jul 6, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00060769 on July 6, 2023Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00060769 on July 6, 2023. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer 1: Laurie McKenna Compliance Officer 2: Katie Corrow Ratios observed were: Staff : Children Room 11, 3 Year Olds: 2 : 5 Room 12, 4/5 Year Olds: 2 : 12 There were two staff members interviewed during this investigation. There were two children interviewed duri