Skip to main content
Childery

Creative Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
98
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5), Safe Sleep & SIDS Prevention (1), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Feb 6, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies During the Modification Inspection Conducted on 2/06/2026Modification

      There were no deficiencies during the Modification Inspection conducted on 2/06/2026. The purpose of the inspection was to increase the capacity of the Infant Room to 8. A full inspection was not conducted. The following was discussed, but not limited to: *The safe placement of cribs. *Crib sheets are tightly fitted to the mattress.

  2. Jan 6, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of This Inspection Was to Conducted Complaint Investigations #00152887 and #00154395 on 1/06/2026Complaint

      The purpose of this inspection was to conducted Complaint Investigations #00152887 and #00154395 on 1/06/2026. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The following ratios were observed: *Infants: 1:1 *One-Year-Olds: 1:3 *Three and Four-Year-Olds: 1:6 There were two staff interviewed as part of this investigation. The following documents were reviewed: *Rosters *Travel Permission Forms Upon completion of Complaints #00152887 and #00154395 it was determined from inte

  3. Sep 12, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Inspection Conducted on 9/12/2025 and Are…Modification

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the modification inspection conducted on 9/12/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. Please submit pictures and the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. **Please submit an updated copy of the C of O to the Department.

  4. Aug 14, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint # 140979 Investigation Conducted on 8/14/2025,…Complaint

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Complaint # 140979 investigation conducted on 8/14/2025, subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer contacted the Complainant via email. A full inspection was not conducted. The following room ratios were observed: One's/Two's/Three's/Four's: 2:11 Three staff members were interviewed during this investigation. The following documentation was reviewed: Rosters and attendance records. Upon compl

  5. Apr 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 4/4/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 4/4/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search.

  6. May 2, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Inspection Conducted on 5/2/2024 and Are…Modification

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification inspection conducted on 5/2/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. A full inspection was not conducted. Compliance Officer #1: Archana Navin Compliance Officer #2: Brian Howell

  7. Apr 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 4/17/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 4/17/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower Survey was completed online at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer #1: Archana Navin Compliance Officer #2