Creme De La Creme - Power Ranch
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- 601
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Mar 10, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00161291 Investigation Conducted on 03.10.26 and Are…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00161291 investigation conducted on 03.10.26 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The following room ratios were observed: Infant's: 1:5 One's: 2:12 Two's: 2:12; 1:7; 1:8 Three's: 1:7 Four's: 1:5; 2:10 School Age: 1:13 Three staff members were interviewed during this inv
Feb 4, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the complaint #00158047 investigation conducted on 2/4/2026 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the
Sep 26, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/26/2025 and Is…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 9/26/2025 and is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Group-size contract form
Oct 2, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 10/2/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 10/2/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 13 of 13 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact Form was completed at the time of the ins
Jun 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
- No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 6/6/2024 for Case #00085417Complaint
No deficiencies were observed at the time of the complaint investigation conducted on 6/6/2024 for case #00085417. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: 2:8; 2:10 2-year-old children: 2:12; 1:8; 1:8 3-year-old children: 2:20; 1:9 4/5-year-old children: 1:11 School-Age children: 2:19 There were 3 staff interviewed during the inspection. Documentation observed was a staff file. Upon completion of complaint # 00085417 , it was determined from obs
Oct 4, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 10/4/2023, and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 10/4/2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of inspection. The DES form was completed at the time of inspection. The Empower information was completed after the inspections. The fingerpr