Daffodils
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Group Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.
See All 7 Inspection Visits
Apr 7, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Mid-year Inspection Conducted on 04.07.26, and Are Subject…Midyear
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the mid-year inspection conducted on 04.07.26, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Bill of Rights to the provider at the time of the inspection. Three fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were verified as valid through the DPS website. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt
Oct 10, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Inspection Conducted on 10.10.25, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the annual inspection conducted on 10.10.25, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. Three fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The follo
Apr 23, 20251 Finding1 Important
- A Midyear Compliance Inspection Due at This Time Could Not Be Conducted on 4/23/2025Midyear
A Midyear Compliance inspection due at this time could not be conducted on 4/23/2025, due to temporary closure of the facility. The temporary closure was confirmed via resident on 4/23/2025.
Oct 25, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 10/25/2024 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 10/25/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Empower Self-Evaluation Survey link was emailed to the Provider. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Maintain documentation of the required
Apr 10, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-year Inspection Conducted on 4/10/24Midyear
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-year Inspection conducted on 4/10/24. Compliance Officer #1: Jennifer Forschino A full inspection was not conducted at this time.
Dec 22, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 12/22/2023, And…Initial Monitoring
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection conducted on 12/22/2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A complete inspection was not conducted at this time. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Compliance Officer is Monika Jones.
Oct 23, 20231 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on 10/23/23Compliance (Initial)
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Initial Inspection conducted on 10/23/23. Compliance Officer #1: Jennifer Forschino Compliance Officer Supervisor: Andrea Rach A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection.