Skip to main content
Childery

Dixieland's Childcare 2 Inc

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5) and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. May 8, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00169121 Investigation Conducted on 5/8/26 and Are…Complaint

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00169121 investigation conducted on 5/8/26 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 5/8/26. An email was sent to the Complainant on 5/8/26. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days of the receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. A focused inspection was conducted. The following ratio was observed: 1:4 Two staff members were int

  2. Apr 30, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 04/30/2026, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 04/30/2026, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Correction within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff/household members whose files were reviewed were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were dis

  3. Nov 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 11/04/2025, and Are…Midyear

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Mid-Year inspection conducted on 11/04/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Correction within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff/household members whose files were reviewed were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discu

  4. May 6, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 5/6/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 5/6/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the inspe

  5. Nov 1, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection on 11/1/2024Midyear

      The following deficiency was observed at the time of the Mid-Year Inspection on 11/1/2024. The Mid-Year Inspection was unable to be conducted due to the facility closure. The Compliance Officer attempted to conduct a Mid-Year inspection, after ringing the Child Care Group home doorbell 2 times with an unsuccessful answer. The CO went to the car and attempted to contact the Provider via telephone leaving a voicemail as well as an email to the Provider. Please submit the Plan of Correcti

  6. May 7, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 05/07/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 05/07/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the ins