Dyson's Daycare
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (4), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3), and Hazardous Materials Handling (2). None of the 9 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Nov 18, 20256 Findings6 Important
- Two Children's Files Did Not Contain a Written Agreement with the Parent/guardian13A.16.03.03D
Two children's files did not contain a written agreement with the parent/guardian. Please ensure that parents/guardians receive and sign the center's written agreement, and submit evidence to the specialist. The center is advised to review all children's files to ensure that they have all the requir
- Two Emergency Forms Were Missing the Required Information13A.16.03.04C
Two emergency forms were missing the required information. The center is advised to review children's files and ensure that all children's emergency forms are completed and contain the required information. The center is reminded to maintain emergency information for all children in care and ensure
- One Child in Care Is Missing Evidence of the Lead Blood Test at 12 Months of Age13A.16.03.04E
One child in care is missing evidence of the lead blood test at 12 months of age. Please obtain the documents from the parents/guardians and submit evidence to the specialist. See additional comments sheet.
- Two Children Enrolled Were Missing Evidence of an Updated Immunization Record13A.16.03.04G
Two children enrolled were missing evidence of an updated immunization record. Please obtain the documents from the parents/guardians and submit evidence to the specialist. See additional comments sheet.
- There Were 3 Staff That Had No Evidence of a Staff Orientation in Their File13A.16.06.02
There were 3 staff that had no evidence of a staff orientation in their file. The staff orientations were conducted on site during the inspection. Please ensure that the staff orientation is completed with all staff and keep a record of this in their files. See additional comments sheet.
- At the Time of the Inspection13A.16.10.04A
At the time of the inspection, the 2's classroom had an air freshener, disinfecting wipes, and toy disinfectant within the reach of children. The specialist relocated the items during the inspection making them inaccessible to the children. Please keep potentially hazardous items out of the reach of
Oct 23, 20251 Finding1 Important
- One Aide Has Been Employed with the Center for More Than 90 Days but There Was No Evidence That They Completed The…13A.16.06.12B(3)
One aide has been employed with the center for more than 90 days but there was no evidence that they completed the approved Basic Health and Safety training. Please ensure that they complete the Basic Health and Safety training as soon as possible and send the certificates to the Licensing Specialis
Nov 15, 20242 Findings2 Important
- There Is One Staff Member Who Has Left Employment and the OCC Did Not Receive Written Notification of This From The…13A.16.03.06A(2)
There is one staff member who has left employment and the OCC did not receive written notification of this from the operator. The operator informed the specialist today and it was documented on the discrepancy and staff change form. In the future, please provide written notification to the OCC about
- During the Inspection13A.16.10.04A
During the inspection, the specialist observed Lysol spray on the sink in the infant room and a glue mouse trap underneath the sink in the toddler room within reach of children. There was a child safety lock visible on the sink however, it was not secured due to the adhesive wearing off. The staff m