First Baptist Child Development Center
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 1 inspection since 2025, the issues cited most often were Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1) and Building & Premises Safety (1). None of the 2 findings were critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Jun 23, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-19(14)(a) by Not Ensuring That Protective Cushioning Was The…R381-100-19(14)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-19(14)(a) by not ensuring that protective cushioning was the required depth or thickness determined by the highest designated play surface. In the North East play area, the average depth of the sand did not meet the required depth.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-24(20) by Having an Object in Sleeping Equipment While in Use By…R381-100-24(20)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(20) by having an object in sleeping equipment while in use by sleeping infants. In the Koalas classroom, there was an infant sleeping with a sound machine on the crib mattress.