Skip to main content
Childery

Garcia, Martha

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    4 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Family Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
Licensed capacity
Not Available
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:48
Toddlers1:510

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
Not Regulated

Inspection History

2 Inspection Visits Since 2025 · 5 Findings
1 Critical4 Important

Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (4) and Children's Records & Files (1). Of 5 total findings, 1 was critical.

See All 2 Inspection Visits
  1. Feb 24, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring Electrical Outlets Had Protective Covers When Not In…R430-90-13(11)(a)-(b)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring electrical outlets had protective covers when not in use for children younger than 5 years old. In the living room, there were two outlets without a protective cover. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  2. Feb 13, 20254 Findings1 Critical3 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals AccessibleR430-90-13(9)(a)-(d)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible. In the kitchen, there was a bottle of laundry detergent on top of the garbage can. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Electrical Outlets Had Protective Covers When…R430-90-13(11)(a)-(b)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that electrical outlets had protective covers when not in use for children younger than 5 years old. In the living room, there was one outlet without a protective cover. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Alcohol Containers Accessible While Children Were in CareR430-90-13(14)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having alcohol containers accessible while children were in care. In the kitchen, there were cans of beer accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Admission and Health Assessment Form Is…R430-90-6(11)(a)-(b)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that admission and health assessment form is reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed by the parent at least annually. At the time of inspection, paperwork for one child in care did not have an annual update and signature. This was