Green Hill Child Development Center
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 31
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (4), Discipline & Adult-Child Interaction (4), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (2). None of the 14 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Oct 30, 20255 Findings5 Important
- LS Observed Two Aides Supervising a Group of Children.13A.16.08.02B
- LS Was Not Able to Observe Fragrance Free Soap13A.16.10.02E
- LS Observed a Mop Filled with Cleaning Products in the Food Prep Area.13A.16.10.04C
- Licensing Specialist Observed a Refrigerator Being Used That Was Above 40 Degrees.13A.16.12.05C(2)
- LS Was Not Able to Observe a Thermometer in the Refrigerator13A.16.12.05C(3)
Jun 16, 20257 Findings7 Important
- A Staff Member Stated That She Witnessed Another Staff Member Yanking Children by the Arm During Outside Time.13A.16.07.01
- A Staff Member Witnessed a Teacher Aggressively Pulling Children by the Arm13A.16.07.02A(1)
A staff member witnessed a teacher aggressively pulling children by the arm, and did not report it to protective services or to a law enforcement agency.
- Child Discipline Shall Be Appropriate to the Age, Maturity, and Physical Condition of the Child.13A.16.07.03A(1)
- A Staff Member Stated That Food Was Withheld From a Child Because the Child Arrived a Few Moments After Breakfast Was Served.13A.16.07.03B(3)
- A Staff Member Did Not Ensure the Safety and Security of Child in Care.13A.16.07.06A
- A Staff Member Did Not Ensure That a Child Received Attention to the Childs Individual Needs.13A.16.08.01A(1)
- Licensing Specialist Observed Two Aides Supervising a Group of Children.13A.16.08.02B
Jun 9, 20252 Findings2 Important
- Facility Did Not Report Five New Staff Members to the Office of Child Care Within Five Working Days.13A.16.03.06A(1)
- Facility Did Not Notify the Office of Child Care About the Ending of Employment for Two Staff Members.13A.16.03.06A(2)