Hola Hello Ni Hao Preschool
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 50
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 5 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (3) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 5 Inspection Visits
Feb 18, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00158980 Investigation on 2/18/2026Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00158980 investigation on 2/18/2026. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Written Documentation is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. Mandated reporting requirements were also discussed at this time. Ratios observed were:; One-two year olds: 1:4 Three-five year olds: 2:9. There was 1 staff interviewed during this investigatio
Feb 17, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00158980 Investigation on 2/17/2026Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00158980 investigation on 2/17/2026. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Written Documentation is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: One-two year olds: 1:2 Three-five year olds: 1:8; There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 2 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Th
Sep 26, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/26/2025Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the Compliance Inspection conducted on 9/26/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. 4 of 4 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The fo
Jan 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 1/9/2025, and Are…Initial Monitoring
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection conducted on 1/9/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Name of Compliance Officer: Jennifer Flicker The Written Documentation of correction is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The following was discussed but not limited to: *Tummy time rules were discussed. There were 5 staff files reviewed.
Nov 13, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on 11/13/2024, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Initial)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Initial Inspection conducted on 11/13/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Name of Compliance Officer: Jennifer Flicker Name of Compliance Officer Supervisor: Andrea Rach The Written Documentation is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The following was discussed but not limited to: 1) A new date of employment is required