Hyo-Chin Lee
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (6), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1), and Emergency Preparedness & Drills (1). None of the 8 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Jan 23, 20262 Findings2 Important
- LS Reviewed 4 Emergency Cards That Were Incomplete - Missing Enroll Date, Schedule or Source of Healthcare.13A.15.03.04A(1)
- LS Reviewed 2 Emergency Cards That Were Missing Annual Updates for 202513A.15.03.04A(3)
Feb 12, 20256 Findings6 Important
- One Child Is Missing the Physician's Page of the Health Inventory.13A.15.03.02A
- Three Children Are Missing Lead Screenings.13A.15.03.02B
- LS Reviewed 5 Children's Emergency Forms13A.15.03.04A(1)
LS reviewed 5 children's emergency forms. Four are missing enrollment date, five missing schedule, four missing source of healthcare information, two missing emergency contacts.
- LS Reviewed 5 Child Files and Noted the Missing Information on Emergency Forms, Missing Physician Form, and Missing Lead Forms.13A.15.03.04C
- LS Reviewed 9 Hours of Continued Training Between 3.1.23-2.28.24 and 12 Hours Since 3.1.2413A.15.06.02B(3)
LS reviewed 9 hours of continued training between 3.1.23-2.28.24 and 12 hours since 3.1.24. Provider will complete additional 3 hours to make up for the missed hours between 23--24.
- Provider Did Not Have an Emergency and Disaster Preparedness Plan Available at the Time of Inspection.13A.15.10.01A(1)