ICC Child Development Center
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 67
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (2), Discipline & Adult-Child Interaction (2), and Licensing & Administrative Compliance (1). Of 7 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Mar 31, 20263 Findings3 Important
- LS Was Not Notified of an Injury to a Child That Had Sought Medical Attention 10 Months Ago13A.16.03.06C(3)
LS was not notified of an injury to a child that had sought medical attention 10 months ago. Facility to submit a memorandum of understanding of the regulation and the action plan to ensure that it is followed moving forward.
- LS Observed No Evidence That the Child Had Received Adequate Supervision and Care at All Times13A.16.08.01A(2)(b)
LS observed no evidence that the child had received adequate supervision and care at all times. Facility to submit a written memorandum of understanding of the regulation and how they will ensure that it will be followed moving forward.
- LS Observed No Evidence of the Staff Being Oriented to the Child's Individual Care Needs13A.16.08.01B(1)
LS observed no evidence of the staff being oriented to the child's individual care needs. Facility to submit a memorandum of understanding of the regulation and the action plan moving forward; along with the evidence.
Oct 24, 20252 Findings1 Critical1 Important
- LS Observed Potentially Hazardous Items That Were Accessible to Children in Care; Specifically Bleach Spray Bottles And…13A.16.10.04A
LS observed potentially hazardous items that were accessible to children in care; specifically bleach spray bottles and adult scissors. Assistant Director corrected this at the time of the inspection by placing the items up on a shelf out of reach from the children in care.
- LS Was Not Notified of a New Staff Member That Was Hired June 23, 202513A.16.03.06A(1)
LS was not notified of a new staff member that was hired June 23, 2025. Assistant Director gave LS the notarized, original release of information, medical, privacy rights form and showed evidence that cbc's have been completed at the time of the inspection. Facility to submit a memorandum of unders
Sep 17, 20252 Findings2 Important
- After the Complaint Inspection Was Completed on 08/26/2513A.16.07.02C(1)
After the complaint inspection was completed on 08/26/25, it was determined that the facility was non compliant with this regulation as a staff had a concern for the child but did not report the incident. Facility to submit evidence that a mandated reporter training has been given to all staff.
- After the Complaint Inspection Was Completed on 08/26/2513A.16.07.02C(2)
After the complaint inspection was completed on 08/26/25, it was determined that the facility was in non compliance with this regulation as a staff had a concern for the child but did not report the incident. Facility to submit evidence that a mandated reporter training has been given to all staff.