Indrani Pandigamage
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Group Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 12
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
2 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 13 Findings
Most recent: Dec 5, 2025⤓ Download Inspection History Report (PDF)
13 Important
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (5), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (4), and Curriculum & Developmental Programming (2). None of the 13 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Dec 5, 202512 Findings12 Important
- LS Did Not Observe Any Medical Evolution Records for 3 Children in Care.13A.18.03.04D(3)
- LS Did Not Observe a Lead Test for 3 Children in Care.13A.18.03.04E
- LS Did Not Observe Immunization Records for 3 Children in Care.13A.18.03.04G
- LS Did Not Observe Any Medication Records for 3 Children in Care.13A.18.03.04I(3)
- Ls Did Not Observe a Professional Development Plan Form for the Director.13A.18.06.05G
- LS Did Not Observe a Professional Development Plan with Training Documentation for the Director.13A.18.06.05G
- LS Did Not Observe a Professional Development Plan with Training Documentation for 3 Aides.13A.18.06.07A(5)
- LS Did Not Observe a Professional Development Plan with Training Documentation for 3 Aides.13A.18.06.07A(5)
- LS Was Not Able to Observe a Discipline Policy13A.18.07.03C(1)
- LS Did Not Observe a Posted Daily Written Schedule.13A.18.09.01A
- LS Did Not Observed a Written Individualized Activity Plan for Any Infants13A.18.09.02B
- LS Did Not Observed a Written Activity Pan That Is Available for Reference in the Child Care Space.13A.18.09.02C(1)
Nov 22, 20241 Finding1 Important
- LS Did Not Observe Any Staffing Patterns Posted in the Childcare Area.13A.18.03.05B