Jeffers Hill SAS
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 2 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 2 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 30
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), Medication Administration (1), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). Of 4 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Oct 16, 20243 Findings1 Critical2 Important
- LS Did Not Observe a Medication Authorization Form for One Child Who Has an Epi Pen Maintained at the Facility13A.16.11.04A(1)(a)
LS did not observe a medication authorization form for one child who has an Epi Pen maintained at the facility. Facility must immediately submit evidence of a signed and dated medication administration form and allergy alert plan.
- LS Did Not Observe Evidence of Criminal Background Check Results for One Staff That Are in Compliance with the Rap Back…13A.16.03.05C
LS did not observe evidence of criminal background check results for one staff that are in compliance with the Rap Back requirement of reprinting every five years. Staff person must be reprinted immediately in accordance with the Rap Back Program.
- LS Observed a Carton of Milk on a Table During Breakfast Service13A.16.12.04F(3)
LS observed a carton of milk on a table during breakfast service. The children did not eat breakfast during the inspection, however the milk was being kept on the table instead of being refrigerated until needed.
Oct 16, 20231 Finding1 Important
- LS Did Not Observe All of the Required Documents Being Maintained in Each Staff File13A.16.03.05C
LS did not observe all of the required documents being maintained in each staff file. LS did not observe a Medical Report for one staff and evidence of criminal background check results for another staff member.