Kiddie Academy of Urbana
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 5 (out of 5) and NAEYC accreditation. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 5 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 148
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:3 6 Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 4 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (5), Discipline & Adult-Child Interaction (2), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (2). None of the 12 findings were critical.
See All 4 Inspection Visits
Oct 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
- At the Time of Inspection13A.16.06.09C
At the time of inspection, Licensing Specialist observed no evidence of completion of the required continued training for 3 child care teachers. V.D. completed 7.5 hours of approved continued training completed from 03.24-02-25; C.S. completed 10 hours from 03.24-02.25; and M.H. completed 10.5 hour
Oct 31, 20245 Findings5 Important
- At the Time of Inspection, Licensing Specialist Observed No Evidence of an Appropriate Lead Test for 5 Children.13A.16.03.04E
- At the Time of Inspection, Licensing Specialist Observed No Evidence of a Medical Report Dated Within 5 Years for 1 Employees, S.S.13A.16.06.04A(4)
- At the Time of Inspection, Licensing Specialist Observed No Evidence of an Orientation Session for Aide, J.N.13A.16.06.12C
- The Center's Emergency and Disaster Plan Was Not Updated at Least Annually. The Owner Updated the Plan During the Inspection.13A.16.10.01A(3)(d)
- Licensing Specialist Observed Posted Daily Schedules Indicating That That the Center's Meals Are Served More Than 3…13A.16.12.01C
Licensing Specialist observed posted daily schedules indicating that that the center's meals are served more than 3 hours apart. The operator shall revise the schedules and submit to the OCC.
Nov 17, 20234 Findings4 Important
- The OCC Received a Complaint Regarding a Child That Sustained Bruises on His Arms Which Resembled an Adult Handprint13A.16.07.01
The OCC received a complaint regarding a child that sustained bruises on his arms which resembled an adult handprint. After reviewing video footage provided by the facility from November 16th, it was determined (by the center, LS, and other agency) that the child sustained the bruises as a result of
- The OCC Received a Complaint Regarding a Child That Sustained Bruises on His Arms Which Resembled an Adult Handprint13A.16.07.03B(4)
The OCC received a complaint regarding a child that sustained bruises on his arms which resembled an adult handprint. After reviewing video footage provided by the facility from November 16th, it was determined (by the center, LS, and other agency) that the child sustained the bruises as a result of
- The OCC Received a Complaint Regarding a Child That Sustained Bruises on His Arms Which Resembled an Adult Handprint13A.16.07.06A
The OCC received a complaint regarding a child that sustained bruises on his arms which resembled an adult handprint. After reviewing video footage provided by the facility from November 16th, it was determined (by the center, LS, and other agency) that the child sustained the bruises as a result of
- The OCC Received a Complaint Regarding a Child That Sustained Bruises on His Arms Which Resembled an Adult Handprint13A.16.08.01A(2)(b)
The OCC received a complaint regarding a child that sustained bruises on his arms which resembled an adult handprint. After reviewing video footage provided by the facility from November 16th, it was determined (by the center, LS, and other agency) that the child sustained the bruises as a result of
Oct 17, 20232 Findings2 Important
- The Operator Did Not Provide Written Notification to the Office Containing All the Required Information About The…13A.16.03.06A(1)
The operator did not provide written notification to the office containing all the required information about the addition of a new employee, H.M., who began working in July of 2023.
- The Operator Did Not Provide Written Notification About the Ending of Employment for 3 Staff Members, H.S., Y.S., And…13A.16.03.06A(2)
The operator did not provide written notification about the ending of employment for 3 staff members, H.S., Y.S., and K.S. The director provided the written notification during the inspection.