Skip to main content
Childery

Kids Corner

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3) and Licensing & Administrative Compliance (3). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. Mar 20, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid Inspection Conducted on 3-20-2026 and Are Subject to Changes…Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid inspection conducted on 3-20-2026 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection.

  2. Sep 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9-17-2025 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 9-17-2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Empower Survey was not completed at the time of the inspection. The DES group size checklist was not completed at the time of the inspection.

  3. Mar 20, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid Year Inspection Conducted on 3-20-2025 and Are Subject To…Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid Year inspection conducted on 3-20-2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Empower Survey was not completed at the time of the inspection. The DES group size checklist was not completed at the time of the inspection.

  4. Sep 20, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9-20-2024 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 9-20-2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. State Compliance Officer 1: Joel Guerrero A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Empower Survey was not completed at the time of the inspection. The DES group size checklist was not completed at the time of the i

  5. Mar 14, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid Year Inspection Conducted on 3-14-2024 and Are Subject To…Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid year inspection conducted on 3-14-2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. State Compliance Officer 1: Joel Guerrero State Compliance Officer 2: A full inspection was not conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Empower Survey was not completed at the time of the inspection. The DES group size checklist was not

  6. Sep 20, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9-20-2023 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 9-20-2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Empower Survey was not completed at the time of the inspection.