Kids Day Care
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 70
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Sep 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/9/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 9/9/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search.
Oct 1, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of Complaint 00090580 Investigation Conducted on 10/1/2024, Subject To…Complaint
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of Complaint 00090580 investigation conducted on 10/1/2024, subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer spoke with the Complainant via phone on 10/1/2024. A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 1:3 Ones: 1:6 Two's: 1:6 Three's/Four's: 1:12 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation. The following documentation was
Sep 12, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/12/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 9/12/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower Survey was completed online at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer #1: Archana Navin Compliance Officer #2
Sep 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #89383 Investigation Conducted on 9/5/2024 and Are…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #89383 investigation conducted on 9/5/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1 contacted the Complainant via email on 9/5/2024. A full inspection was not conducted. The Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The following room ratios were observed: Infant's: 1:3 One's: 1:5 Two's: 1:5 Three's/Four's: 1:11 Three staff members were interviewed during this in
Sep 28, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Monitoring Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/28/23 And…Monitoring
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the monitoring compliance inspection conducted on 9/28/23 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted.
Sep 13, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 9/13/23 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 9/13/23 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days The following item is due within 10 days of receiving this document: The county food catering permit. A copy of the architectural plans uploaded to t