Kidspark
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 65
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (3), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Jan 7, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #000153491 Investigation on 1/7/26Complaint Compliance (Annual)
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #000153491 investigation on 1/7/26. A full inspection was also conducted at this time. The Written Documentation is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The following was discussed but not limited to: 1) New rules that were effective 8/3/2025; 2) Required timeframe of obtaining a fingerprint clearance card for staff who turn 18 years old; and 3)
Dec 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00152555 Investigation on 12/9/25Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00152555 investigation on 12/9/25. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Written Documentation of Corrections is requested to be submitted in the LMS portal within 10 days of reciept of the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: 1:1 Two-year-olds There were 4 staff interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: The complainant. Documentation obser
Dec 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of This Inspection Was to Perform Complaint Investigation #00152355 Conducted on 12/04/2025Complaint
The purpose of this inspection was to perform Complaint Investigation #00152355 conducted on 12/04/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Please submit the Plan of Corrections through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The following ratios were observed: *Two-year-olds - Six-year-olds: 3:16 The Complainant was interviewed as part of the investigation. There were four staff members interviewed as part of this investiga
Jan 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/17/2025, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 1/17/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Name of Compliance Officer: Jennifer Flicker The Written Documentation is required to be submitted through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of the receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The following was discussed but not limited to: 1) Locating or re-doing the Director’s original orientation form that was completed in 2017
May 10, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation 83916 on 5.10.2024Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Complaint investigation 83916 on 5.10.2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days. Ratios observed were as follows: 2's and up 3:13 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 3 staff files reviewed during this investigation. 3 of 3 Fingerprint Clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. Others inter
Feb 1, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 2/1/2024 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 2/1/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days. 4 of 4 Fingerprint Clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower self-evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Plan update form was completed at the time of the inspection. The following wa