KinderCare - North Salt Lake
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Child Care Quality System rating of Default Foundation of Quality and NAEYC accreditation. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 4 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), Children's Records & Files (2), and Infectious Disease Prevention & Control (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 4 Inspection Visits
May 4, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(c) by Not Ensuring That Each Caregiver Maintains Active…R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-11(1)(c) by not ensuring that each caregiver maintains active supervision of each child by knowing the number of children in their care at any time. In Toddler A Room, the caregiver stated they had 6 children in care when there were 7 children in
Apr 22, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-23(5) by Not Ensuring the Diapering Surface Is Smooth, Waterproof, And…R381-100-23(5)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-23(5) by not ensuring the diapering surface is smooth, waterproof, and in good repair. In the Toddler A Room, the diapering surface had a cut in the material making it not waterproof or in good repair.
Feb 12, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having a Caregiver Who Had an Inappropriate Interaction with A…R381-100-12(5)(a)-(f)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a caregiver who had an inappropriate interaction with a child. In the facility, a child was forcibly restrained to their cot when they did not want to take a nap.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having a CaregiverR381-100-6(3)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a caregiver, and an assistant director, who did not protect children from conduct that endangered the children in care. In the facility, a child was forcibly restrained to their cot, by their caregiver, when they did not want to take a nap.
May 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Admission and Health Assessment Forms Not Reviewed,…R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having admission and health assessment forms not reviewed, updated, and signed by the parents annually. At the facility, there was an admission and health assessment form not reviewed, updated, and signed annually. This was a repeat rule noncompli