Labourers for Jesus Excellent Early Learning
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (6), Children's Records & Files (3), and Parent Communication & Policies (1). None of the 12 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Apr 23, 20252 Findings2 Important
- LS Observed a Child in Care with No Emergency Card.13A.15.03.02A
- LS Observed an Emergency Card Needed Two Updated Annual Signatures.13A.15.03.04A(3)
Apr 25, 202410 Findings10 Important
- LS Did Not Observe an Attendance Sheet for Children in Care.13A.15.03.03B
- LS Observed a Child in Care Without an Updated Signature.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- LS Observed Soft Bedding Items (Objects Such as Bibs, Bottles, Toys and Blankets) in the Crib with Children in Care.13A.15.05.06F
- LS Observed 8 Children in the Home with 4 Being Under 2 and Only One Adult Present13A.15.07.07A
LS observed 8 children in the home with 4 being under 2 and only one adult present. This was corrected onsite by the coprovider returning to the home.
- LS Did Not Observe the Co Provider Present Was Not Present in the Home to See nor Hear the Child in Care. This Was Corrected Onsite.13A.15.08.01B(3)
- The Co Provider Was Not Present to Render Immediate Assistance for the Additional 2 Children Present.13A.15.08.01B(4)
- LS Did Not Observe Co-Provider Present in the Home with 4 Children Present Under the Age of 2.13A.15.08.01C(1)
- LS Did Not Observe the Co Provider Present Within Sight and Sound of the Children Present.13A.15.08.01D(1)(a)
- LS Observed Children Younger Than 2 Napping with Materials to Hinder the Ability to Determine if a Child Is Sleeping Safely.13A.15.08.01D(1)(b)
- LS Observed 2 Additional Children in Care Without Their Assigned Provider Present in Care.13A.15.08.01F