Lil Tiggers
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a YoungStar rating of 2 Star. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Wisconsin's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Wisconsin caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:4, and preschool ratios at 1:13. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 15 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- YoungStar 2 Star (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (3), Licensing & Administrative Compliance (2), and Curriculum & Developmental Programming (1). None of the 12 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Oct 6, 20256 Findings6 Important
- Monitoring Results Posted250.04(2)(i)1.a.
Documentation of the most recent monitoring results was not posted
- Child Record - Health History - Medical Condition Symptoms250.04(6)(a)1m.f.
Documentation of complete health history information was not observed for served for a child with a medical condition.
- Potential Source Of Harm On Premises250.06(2)(e)
The garage was open enough for a child to fit through.
- Meals & Snacks - Minimum Meal Requirements250.06(9)(h)
Milk was not served with lunch
- Medical Log Book250.07(6)(b)1.
The medical log book did not have numbered pages.
- Medical Log Book - Evidence Of Injuries Received In Or Out O250.07(6)(b)3.a.
A child with an injury was not documented in a medial log book.
Sep 17, 20246 Findings6 Important
- Child Record - Enrollment Information - Other Emergency Cont250.04(6)(a)1.e.
Documentation of complete contact information for an emergency contact was not observed for a child
- Child Record - Enrollment Information - Authorized Pickup250.04(6)(a)1.g
Documentation of a person authorized to pick up a child was not observed for a child and was not complete for another c
- Potential Source Of Harm On Premises250.06(2)(e)
The skirting surround for the bathtub was missing and elements were exposed and accessible to children in care.
- Premises - Condition & Repair250.06(2)(m)
The front porch was observed to have a crumpled empty bubble bottle, paper or tissue on the ground and a used cup on a c
- Naps - Bedding250.07(4)(d)
A child napping on a sofa did not have a sheet
- Medical Log Book250.07(6)(b)1.
Medical log book was not available for review.