Skip to main content
Childery

Luz de arcoíris #2

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. Mar 26, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on March 26, 2026 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on March 26, 2026 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Three of three fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. BCCL staff emailed the Empower Self-Evaluation Assessment link to the Provide

  2. Sep 15, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Midyear Inspection Conducted on September 15Midyear

      There were no deficiencies found at the time of the Midyear Inspection conducted on September 15, 2025 subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided the facility with a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights at the start of the inspection. Note: A full inspection was not conducted. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid on the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via t

  3. Apr 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on April 8, 2025, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on April 8, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Three of three fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. The link for the Empower Survey was emailed to the Provider following the ins

  4. Jul 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Cited on July 5, 2024Initial Monitoring

      The following deficiency was cited on July 5, 2024. Compliance Officer 1 is Laurie McKenna Compliance Officer 1 went to the home for the purpose of conducting an Initial Monitor inspection on 7/5/24. The inspection was not conducted because there was no response at the home when Compliance Officer 1 knocked on the door nor when CO 1 phoned the Provider while outside of the group home. The Provider contacted CO1 later that day by phone, to inform her that they had not been operatin

  5. Apr 25, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Monitor to the Initial Inspection Conducted on April 25, 2024,…Monitoring

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Monitor to the Initial inspection conducted on April 25, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer 1: Laurie McKenna One of one fingerprint clearance cards was verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. Items discussed but not limi

  6. Apr 11, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Initial Licensing Inspection Conducted on April 11, 2024, And…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Initial Licensing Inspection conducted on April 11, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer: Laurie McKenna Compliance Officer Supervisor: Lisa Emery Two of two fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies