Skip to main content
Childery

Manyuat, Ernest

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    4 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Family Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
Licensed capacity
Not Available
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:48
Toddlers1:510

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
Not Regulated

Inspection History

3 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 5 Findings
5 Important

Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3), Emergency Preparedness & Drills (1), and Building & Premises Safety (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.

See All 3 Inspection Visits
  1. Apr 20, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring That Covered Individuals Submit a New…R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c)

      The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that covered individuals submit a new background form and fingerprints when they turn 18 years old. At the time of inspection, one household member had turned 18 years old and submitted a new background form, but had not sub

  2. Apr 11, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring That Covered Individuals Submit a New…R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c)

      The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that covered individuals submit a new background form and fingerprints for updates when they turn 18 years old. At the time of inspection, one household member had turned 18 years old and submitted a new background form, but

  3. May 9, 20243 Findings3 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Hot Water That Exceeded 120 Degrees Fahrenheit Accessible…R430-90-13(17)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having hot water that exceeded 120 degrees Fahrenheit accessible to children. In the bathroom sink the hot water temperature measured 25 degrees Fahrenheit. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Conducting Fire Drills QuarterlyR430-90-14(4)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not conducting fire drills quarterly. At the time of inspection, there had been just one fire drill conducted since 2023. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That New Covered Individual's Submit an Online…R430-90-8(2)(a)-(d)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that new covered individual's submit an online background check form and fingerprints for individuals age 18 years and older. At the time of inspection, there was one individual living at the home that had not been found eligible.