Marycarmens II Learning Center
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1) and Children's Records & Files (1). None of the 2 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Oct 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring the Single-age Group Had The…R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) by not ensuring the single-age group had the required caregivers, not exceeding the maximum group size, and not exceed the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. In the infant room, there were 9 infants and young toddle
Apr 10, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-6(10) by Not Having Each Parent Complete a Health Assessment Form For…R381-100-6(10)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-6(10) by not having each parent complete a health assessment form for their child before the child is admitted into the child care program. At the facility, there was a child admitted into the child care program without a health assessment form.