McBride, Victoria dba Children's Cottage Murray
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (3), Emergency Preparedness & Drills (1), and Children's Records & Files (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Feb 28, 20254 Findings4 Important
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with Rule R430-90-13(17) by Not Ensuring That Hot Water Accessible to Children Did…R430-90-13(17)
The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R430-90-13(17) by not ensuring that hot water accessible to children did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit. At the handwashing sink in the kitchen, the water reached 127 degrees Fahrenheit. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 03/06/2024.
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with Rule R430-90-14(7)(a)-(e) by Not Documenting Fire DrillsR430-90-14(7)(a)-(e)
The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R430-90-14(7)(a)-(e) by not documenting fire drills. At the time of inspection, the last fire drill documented was in August 2024. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 02/01/2023.
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with Rule R430-90-19(3)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring That Stationary Play Equipment Had A…R430-90-19(3)(a)-(c)
The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R430-90-19(3)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that stationary play equipment had a three foot use zone. In the outdoor play area, there was a picnic table within the use zone of the orange slide.
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with Rule R430-90-9(16) by Having a Gap Five by Five Inches or Greater in or Under…R430-90-9(16)
The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R430-90-9(16) by having a gap five by five inches or greater in or under the fence or barrier. In the outdoor play area, there was a gap greater than five by five inches under the fence.
Mar 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Each Child in Care Had the Required PaperworkR430-90-6(9)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that each child in care had the required paperwork. At the time of inspection, one child in care did not have a health assessment. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.