Miss Billies Kids Kampus
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 1 inspection since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (2), Emergency Preparedness & Drills (1), and Hazardous Materials Handling (1). Of 4 total findings, 1 was critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Oct 8, 20244 Findings1 Critical3 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals Accessible to Children And…R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children and stored in unlabeled containers. In the Kindergarten, Little Llamas, and bathroom, there were chemicals accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Having the Documentation for Fire and Disaster Drills On-site…R381-100-14(9)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having the documentation for fire and disaster drills on-site for review. At the facility, there was no documentation on-site for review of the previous 12 months of fire and disaster drills. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Parent of a Child Completed the Admission…R381-100-6(10)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the parent of a child completed the admission and health assessment form before being admitted into the program. At the facility, two children did not have a completed admission and health assessment form. This was a repeat rule
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Incomplete Children's RecordsR381-100-6(12)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, a child's admission and health assessment form had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.