Moon Mountain School Head Start
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- 39
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 5 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 5 Inspection Visits
May 5, 20261 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 5/5/2026Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 5/5/2026. The Compliance Officer provided a copy of the Notice of Inspection to the licensee at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. BCCL staff emailed the Empower Self-Evaluation link to the Provider The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the
May 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 5/8/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 5/8/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Compliance Officer provided the facility with a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights at the start of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified as valid thro
Jan 23, 20251 Finding1 Important
- No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint Investigation #00096064 Conducted on 1/23/2025Complaint
No deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint Investigation #00096064 conducted on 1/23/2025. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The ratios observed were: School-age: 2:25 There were 2 staff interviewed during the inspection. There was 1 District Manager interviewed during the inspection. Documentation reviewed: Student Behavior Reports, Training Hours The Compliance Officer spoke to the
Aug 12, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 8/12/2024Initial Monitoring
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Monitoring Inspection conducted on 8/12/2024. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *The Date of Enrollment must be on all the Emergency, Information & Immunization Record cards. Compliance Officer #1 is Sherri Pavlisick. Compliance Officer #2 is Elizabeth Enriquez.
Jun 11, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed During the Initial Compliance Inspection Conducted on 06/11/2024 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Initial)
There were no deficiencies observed during the Initial Compliance Inspection conducted on 06/11/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Ensure the power surges are covered. Compliance Officer is AuReyon Thompson Compliance Officer Supervisor