Mountain School Elementary
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- 59
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (2). None of the 3 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Apr 21, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 4-21-2026 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiency was observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 4-21-2026 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted at this time. 4 of 4 fingerprint cards were verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. BCCL staff sent The Empower Survey via email. There were no discrepancies with the DES Group Size at the time of the inspection.
Feb 6, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on2/6/25 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on2/6/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted at this time. Compliance Officer (C.O): Jamie Anderson The Written Documentation of Corrections was not accepted during the exit interview. 2 of 2 fingerprint cards were not verified to be valid via the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Clearance cards were sent via email from the
Feb 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
- Program Was Unable to Be Inspected Due to Weather Conditions.Compliance (Annual)