Murillo, Mona Lisa dba Bumble Bee Daycare
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 4 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Emergency Preparedness & Drills (2), Building & Premises Safety (1), and Children's Records & Files (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 4 Inspection Visits
Jul 14, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-13(7) by Having Empty Plastic Bags Accessible to Children Under Five…R430-90-13(7)
The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(7) by having empty plastic bags accessible to children under five years old. In the kitchen, gallon-size bags were found in a drawer. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 01/03/2023.
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-14(4) by Not Conducting a Fire Drill at Least QuarterlyR430-90-14(4)
The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-14(4) by not conducting a fire drill at least quarterly. At the time of the inspection, no fire drills had been conducted during the second quarter. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 10/15/2024 and 07/28/2023.
Jan 31, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Admission Forms and Health Assessments For…R430-90-6(11)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the admission forms and health assessments for children in care have an annual update and signature. At the time of inspection, the paperwork for one child in care did not have the annual update and signature. This was a repeat
Dec 23, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having a New Covered Individual Living at Their Home Who Does Not…R430-90-8(2)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a new covered individual living at their home who does not appear in the CCL provider portal. At the time of the inspection, one of the provider's adult children is living in the home and they do not have a current background clearance.
Sep 10, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Conducting Quarterly Fire DrillsR430-90-14(4)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not conducting quarterly fire drills. At the time of the inspection, the second and third quarter fire drills had not been conducted. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.