Nakia Jackson
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (4), First Aid & Pediatric CPR (1), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). None of the 9 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Jun 3, 20254 Findings4 Important
- LS Did Not Observe One Child's Emergency Form.13A.15.03.04A(3)
- LS Did Not Observe Three Children's Part 1 Health Inventory13A.15.03.04C
LS did not observe three children's Part 1 Health Inventory. LS did not observe one child's lead results and one child's Health Inventory Part II .
- LS Did Not Observe 2 Flexible Gauze Rolls, Liquid Fragrance Free Soap, and a Whistle in the First Aid Kit.13A.15.10.01H(1)
- LS Observed a Refrigerator That Was Not Cleaned.13A.15.12.02A
Jun 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
- LS Observed One Emergency Form Without Physician Information, One Emergency Form That Was Not Updated and One Emergency Form Missing.13A.15.03.04A(3)
Jun 14, 20234 Findings4 Important
- LS Observed 3 Out 4 Outdated Emergency Forms (SS, DB, DL)13A.15.03.04A(3)
- LS Observed an Uncovered Grill in the Backyard.13A.15.05.05A
- LS Observed Children Watching Television and a Tablet with Cartoons on It. - Corrected on Site.13A.15.09.01B(3)
- LS Observed Alcoholic Beverage in the Refrigerator and Potentially Harmful Items in the Bathroom in Reach of Children (…13A.15.10.02
LS observed alcoholic beverage in the refrigerator and potentially harmful items in the bathroom in reach of children ( Febreze and other harmful items) - corrected on site