Nakia Mckinley
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 6
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (5), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1), and Parent Communication & Policies (1). None of the 8 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Apr 29, 20256 Findings6 Important
- The Provider Needs to Submit Updated Medical Evaluations to the LS.13A.15.02.03B(2)
- The Provider Didn't Have Documentation of the Guide.13A.15.03.03E
- The Provider's Front Stairs to the Home Are Loose and Pose a Safety Hazard.13A.15.05.01B
- The LS Observed That the Lighting in the Room Was Dull and Blinked. The Room Needs a Brighter Bulb.13A.15.05.04A(4)
- Outside Area Needs to Be Mowed and Outdoor Toys Evident and Ready to Play.13A.15.05.05A
- The Provider Has Her First Aide Kit Accessible. The Provider Needs to Place Fragrance Free Soap in Her Kit.13A.15.10.01H(1)
Mar 26, 20242 Findings2 Important
- The LS Observed That the Living Room Walkway Tiles Are Cracking and Posing a Falling Hazard13A.15.05.01B
The LS observed that the living room walkway tiles are cracking and posing a falling hazard. The provider will replace the tiles and will send the LS a picture to documents the correction.
- The LS Observed That a Tree Fell Into a Line and Is on the Provider's Fence13A.15.05.05A
The LS observed that a tree fell into a line and is on the provider's fence. The LS pointed this out to the provider and she took pictures. The LS advised the provider that children can't be taken outside until that line is fixed. It is not known if its an electrical line.