Nanny's Daycare/Preschool
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 134
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 5 Inspection Visits
Jul 23, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/23/25, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 7/23/25, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the LMS Portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. The Compliance Officer provided the facil
Jan 14, 20251 Finding1 Important
- A Complaint Inspection Was Conducted for Case 00095656 on 1/14/2025Complaint
A Complaint inspection was conducted for case 00095656 on 1/14/2025. The following deficiencies were cited and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Senior Compliance Officer-Cara Leyme, MC 3 staff files were reviewed. 2 staff were interviewed. Complainant was interviewed. Documentation reviewed: rosters staff files Ratio: Infant - 1:2 1 & 2 year old - 2:8 3 & 4 year old - 1:5 4 & 5 year old - 2:7 Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal
Nov 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/5/2024, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 11/5/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Senior Compliance Officer- Cara Leyme, MC 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the inspection. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online Portal within 10 days of receiving this report. Insurance-10/18/2025 FIre-11/15/2022- not current Sanitation- 6/30/2025
Dec 29, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case #00066816 on 12/29/2023Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case #00066816 on 12/29/2023. A full inspection was not conducted. Senior Compliance Officer- Cara Leyme, MC Ratios observed: Infant- 1:2 1 y/o- 1:2 3 y/o- 2:6 4 y/o-2:9 There was 6 staff interviewed. There was 1 staff file requested. Documentation observed: Attendance rosters Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it was determined from observation, interviews, and documentation that the
Nov 8, 20231 Finding1 Important
- A Compliance Inspection Was Conducted on 11//8/2023 and the Following Deficiencies Were Observed and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
A Compliance inspection was conducted on 11//8/2023 and the following deficiencies were observed and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Senior Compliance Officer (CO)- Cara Leyme, MC 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid on the DPS website. Insurance 10/18/2024 Fire 11/15/2022 Sanitation 6/30/2024 The Empower Survey was requested. DES group sizes were reviewed. Please complete the Plan of Corrections via the online portal within 10