New Prime Inc
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 1 inspection since 2025, the issues cited most often were Hazardous Materials Handling (2), Children's Records & Files (1), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Mar 31, 20255 Findings5 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-13(4) by Having Choking Hazards Accessible to Children Younger Than 3…R381-100-13(4)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years of age. In the Orange Room, there were craft pom poms accessible to children. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 09/20/2023.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-13(7) by Having Empty Plastic Bags Large Enough for a Child's Head To…R381-100-13(7)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-13(7) by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than 5 years of age. In the Purple Room, there were empty plastic bags in lockers.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-14(1)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring Their Written Emergency Preparedness,…R381-100-14(1)(a)-(e)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-14(1)(a)-(c) by not ensuring their written emergency preparedness, response, and recovery plan included instructions to follow in case of an allergy or serious reaction to food or any other trigger that may affect the child's health. At the facility,
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) by Not Ensuring That Baby FoodR381-100-24(13)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) by not ensuring that baby food, formula, or breast milk brought from home were labeled with the name, date, and the time they were prepared. In the Yellow Room, there were bottles brought from home that were not labeled with the times th
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) by Having Admission and Health Assessment Forms Not…R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) by having admission and health assessment forms not reviewed, updated, and signed by the parents annually. At the facility, there were admission and health assessment forms not reviewed, updated, and signed annually. This was a repeat non