Skip to main content
Childery

Ocampo Light Bringer Learning Center

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    3 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 2 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 2 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1), and Building & Premises Safety (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. Feb 18, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed During the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 02.18.26, but Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed during the Annual Compliance inspection conducted on 02.18.26, but are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. BCCL staff emailed the Empower Self-Evaluation link to the provider. 3 of 3 fingerprint car

  2. Aug 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 8/4/2025Midyear

      There were no deficiencies at the time of the Mid-Year Inspection conducted on 8/4/2025, but are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. A full inspection was not conducted. 3 of 3 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed, but not limited to: Emergency, Information, a

  3. Feb 25, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 2/25/2025 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 2/25/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Group Size Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower

  4. Aug 29, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 8/29/2024Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-Year Inspection conducted on 8/29/2024. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 staff members and 1 resident was verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Ensure pool fence is rust free. Compliance Officer is Patti Longman.

  5. Mar 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 4/6/2024 and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 4/6/2024 and are subject to changes pending a programmatic review. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed to the provider. Please complete within 10 days. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members and 1 of 1 resident were verified to

  6. Oct 6, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complain #64466 and Mid-year Investigation Conducted On…Complaint Midyear

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complain #64466 and mid-year investigation conducted on 10/6/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1 attempted to contact the Complainant on 10/6/2023. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. The following room ratios were observed: 2's/3's/4's: 2:2 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation.