Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Early Learning & Childcare Program
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 71
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
2 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 10 Findings
Most recent: Jul 10, 2025⤓ Download Inspection History Report (PDF)
10 Important
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (9) and Building & Premises Safety (1). None of the 10 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Jul 10, 20253 Findings3 Important
- Ls Observed That Two Classroom Baseboards Had Chipped Paint13A.16.05.01A(1)
- Ls Observed That Aides Did Not Have Professional Development Form13A.16.06.12B(1)
- Ls Observed That Aides Did Not Have Required Training13A.16.06.12B(2)
Jul 9, 20247 Findings7 Important
- LS Observed That Teacher Did Not Have Required 12 Hours of Training13A.16.06.09C
- Ls Observed That Teacher Did Not Have Required Training13A.16.06.10C(1)
- Ls Observed That Teacher Did Not Have Training Document on the Professional Development Plan13A.16.06.10C(2)
- Ls Observed That Staff Did Not Have Basic Health and Safety Training13A.16.06.10C(3)
- Ls Observed That Aides Did Not Have Required Trainng13A.16.06.12B(1)
- LS Observed That Have Training on the Professional Development Plan13A.16.06.12B(2)
- Ls Observed That Aides Did Not Have Basic Health and Safety.13A.16.06.12B(3)